1A) and spotted necrosis (Supporting Fig 1) in wild-type (WT) C5

1A) and spotted necrosis (Supporting Fig. 1) in wild-type (WT) C57BL/6 mice by 16 hours postinjection. However, to our surprise, α-Galcer induced 5- to 6-fold higher serum ALT and AST levels and a larger area of necrosis in IL-4−/−IFN-γ−/− dKO mice than those in WT mice at 16 hours after α-Galcer injection (Fig. 1; Supporting Fig. 1). In addition, administration of α-Galcer induced an accumulation of inflammatory foci in the livers of BMS-907351 datasheet WT mice, with the peak effect occurring

at 72 hours postinjection (Supporting Fig. 1), and the number of inflammatory foci was also much higher in dKO mice than that in WT mice (Supporting Fig. 1). To determine the role of early production of IL-4 in α-Galcer-induced liver injury, we examined the effects in IL-4−/− and IL-4R−/− Z VAD FMK mice. As illustrated in Fig. 2A,B, α-Galcer-induced elevation of serum ALT and AST was lower in IL-4−/− and

IL-4R−/− mice than in WT controls. Liver histology analyses further revealed that IL-4−/− and IL-4R−/− mice had reduced liver necrosis and fewer inflammatory foci than WT control mice after α-Galcer administration (Figs. 2C-D). The number of myeloperoxidase (MPO)-positive neutrophils was also lower in IL-4−/− and IL-4R−/− mice than in WT mice 72 hours after α-Galcer administration (Fig. 2C,D). The above findings indicated that the number of inflammatory foci (iNKT expansion) in the liver was lower in IL-4−/− or IL-4R−/− mice than in WT mice 72 hours post-α-Galcer injection, which may have been due to IL-4-mediated promotion of iNKT proliferation, Mannose-binding protein-associated serine protease as demonstrated previously.[17] Fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analyses of liver MNCs revealed that WT and IL-4−/− mice had a similar number of iNKT cells at the early timepoints post-α-Galcer injection (data not shown), which does not explain the reduced liver injury in IL-4−/− mice. To further explore the mechanisms underlying α-Galcer-induced liver injury, we examined NK cells and neutrophils in the liver. In this case, FACS analyses revealed that the number of NK cells was not increased post-α-Galcer injection and that depletion of NK cells using an anti-ASGM1

antibody did not affect α-Galcer-induced liver injury in mice (data not shown), suggesting that NK cells are not involved in this process. In contrast, there was a striking increase in the percentage and total number of neutrophils in the liver after α-Galcer injection. As illustrated in Fig. 3A,B, the percentage of neutrophils was elevated 4-fold, whereas the total number of neutrophils was elevated 30-fold at 3 hours post-α-Galcer administration. Moreover, depletion of neutrophils markedly reduced serum ALT and AST levels (Fig. 3C), suggesting that the accumulation of neutrophils contributes to α-Galcer-induced hepatocellular damage. Figure 3D shows that the percentage and total number of hepatic neutrophils were lower in IL-4−/− mice than in WT mice at 3 hours post-α-Galcer administration. Furthermore, Fig.

Comments are closed.