Th2-biased OVA-specific DO11.10 cells were transferred into

BALB/c mice, and these mice were challenged i.n. with either OVA or OVA-IC. Twenty-four selleck chemicals hours after the last challenge, the mice that had received OVA-IC not only had significantly increased total cell counts in the BALF, as compared to PBS or anti-OVA IgG treated mice, but these mice also presented with significantly increased total cell numbers, as compared to OVA challenged mice (Fig. 4A). These differences resulted mainly from increased eosinophil counts, as mice challenged with OVA-IC had more than three times higher eosinophil counts in the BALF, as compared to OVA challenged mice. Eosinophilia was negligible in PBS and anti-OVA IgG-treated mice (Fig. 4B). Importantly, control animals not receiving Th2-biased DO11.10 cells but challenged three times with OVA-IC showed no peribronchial/perivascular inflammation and their BALF of was devoid of eosionophils (data not shown), suggesting that no other FcγR-expressing inflammatory cells independently (e.g. macrophages) caused eosinophila and inflammation. In line with the cellular data, lung function confirmed the severe airway Belinostat hypersensitivity reaction in mice treated with OVA (Fig. 4C).

Because provocation was terminated for ethical reasons once the animals had reached an ED200RL, the lung function did not quantify a further impairment when mice were challenged with OVA-IC. However, the mice treated with OVA-IC revealed a

markedly augmented perivascular and peribronchiolar infiltrate of mononuclear cells, thereby providing evidence for more severe pulmonary inflammation (Fig. 4D–F). Taken together, these data suggest that allergen-specific IgG-IC can contribute to enhanced eosinophilia, increased airway inflammation and resulting airway hyperresponsiveness Morin Hydrate when administered i.n. in a Th2 T-cell-dependent murine asthma model. Next, we wished to better define whether or not the increased airway inflammation was a result of enhanced antigen presentation and T-cell proliferation. Therefore, we allowed IC-formation to occur in vivo and examined the resulting T-cell stimulation by DC from lung-draining LN. BALB/c mice were treated i.n. with PBS or anti-OVA IgG (anti-OVA and OVA-IC groups), followed by inhalation of 1% OVA aerosol for 20 min (OVA and OVA-IC groups) on two consecutive days. Twelve hours after the last challenge, lung-draining LN were removed, and DC were isolated and co-cultured with CSFE-labeled DO11.10. As shown in Fig. 5A and B, DC isolated form mice that had received anti-OVA IgG i.n. followed by inhalative challenge with OVA led to a highly significant and at least 100% increase in antigen-specific T-cell stimulation, as compared to DC from mice that were challenged with OVA alone. These data suggest that allergen-specific IgG-IC formation in vivo following allergen inhalation can result in enhanced T-cell proliferation induced by DC in lung-draining LN.