984 and 0.997), which implies that they might be escapees from the farm. Both individuals were caught 7 km from the farm. Fig. 3 Proportional membership of each American mink in the two clusters identified

by STRUCTURE. Each American mink is represented by a single vertical bar. The locality of origin for each individual is indicated below Population genetic substructure and membership was further evaluated by using the population assignment and PCA of individual American mink (Fig. 4). Assignment tests showed that 65 mink (97 %) caught in the wild were assigned to the feral population, whereas 2 mink (3 %) were assigned to ranch mink. Simultaneously, the 18 mink from the farm (100 %) were correctly assigned to the ranch population. The PCA performed using individual mink genotypes identified discrete clusters (Fig. 4). PCA Axis 1 and 2 accounted for 51.4 % (34.7 this website and 16.7 %, learn more respectively) of the total variation (Fig. 4). Axis 1 of the PCA separated feral Rabusertib order and ranch individuals but feral individuals

from different sites were scattered over the graph revealing a high degree of overlap between sites (Fig. 4). Two individuals from the Artibai site were assigned to ranch mink. Fig. 4 Principal coordinates analysis of individuals from 5 river catchments and one mink farm (upper panel) and genetic assignment to feral and ranch mink of individuals captured in these river catchments and at the farm (lower panel) The isolation-by-distance analysis (Mantel test) shows a very weak, but significant, positive relationship Lck between geographical and genetic distances (Fig. 5). When individuals from

Artibai which were an admixture with ranch mink were excluded from analyses this relationship was not significant (analyses did not show). Fine-scale spatial autocorrelation analyses further resolved the scale of spatial structuring among feral American mink. The autocorrelation coefficient (r) was significantly positive over a distance of 5 km, showing that spatial genetic structure was detected only for this distance (Fig. 6). Fig. 5 Correlation between genetic and geographic distance (the Euclidean distance in km) among all pairs of feral American mink individuals in Biscay Fig. 6 Spatial genetic structure for feral American mink pairwise individuals in Biscay (Basque Country, Northern Spain). The permutation 95 % confidence interval (dashed lines) and the bootstrapped 95 % confidence error bars are also shown. The numbers of pairwise comparisons within each distance class is presented above the plotted values. Stars indicate statistically significant spatial autocorrelation values (**P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001) River variables affecting mink population The average home range of male European mink in the study area was found to be 13 km of river. This was the largest home range, when considering the two species and the two genders (Kruskal–Wallis test, H = 9.290, P = 0.026, df = 3; Table 2).