, 2008 and Timms and Moss, 1984)

Another indication of a

, 2008 and Timms and Moss, 1984).

Another indication of an upcoming shift in this region can be found in the increasing dominance of floating macrophytes at the expense of the submerged selleck chemical macrophytes (Scheffer et al., 2003 and Zhao et al., 2012b). Floating macrophytes are able to better cope with lower light conditions than submerged macrophytes because they grow at the water surface. When light conditions deteriorate close to the shifting point, floating macrophytes will therefore predominate submerged macrophytes (Scheffer et al., 2003). While macrophytes disappeared, the total primary production of Taihu increased more than twofold from 1960 (5.46 t · km− 2 yr− 1) to 1990 (11.66 t · km− 2 yr− 1) owing to the increasing phytoplankton biomass that bloomed due to the excessive nutrient input (Li et al., 2010). The first algal blooms occurred in 1987 in Meiliang

selleck screening library Bay (Fig. 5, 1980s). Subsequently, algal blooms dominated by non-N2 fixing cyanobacteria (Microcystis) increased in coverage and frequency, and appeared earlier in the season ( Chen et al., 2003b, Duan et al., 2009 and Paerl et al., 2011b). The presence of mainly non-N2 fixing cyanobacteria indicates that external and internally-supplied nitrogen are sufficient to maintain proliferation over N2-fixers ( Paerl et al., 2011b). The early blooms in the northern bays and western shores occurred right where enrichment was

most severe and easterly winds drove algae to form thick scums ( Chen et al., 2003b and Li Thymidine kinase et al., 2011a). At that time, high concentrations of suspended solids in the lake centre due to wind action ( Fig. 8) might have prevented algal growth by light limitation ( Li et al., 2011a and Sun et al., 2010). Despite this mechanism, blooms also emerged in the lake centre from 2002 onwards ( Duan et al., 2009). Finally, in 2007 the problems with drinking water became so severe that it was not possible to ignore the blooms anymore ( Qin et al., 2010). The effects of excessive nutrient loads go beyond the shift in primary producers alone and appear also higher in the food web. As the biomass of primary producers and zooplankton grew over time, the biomass of higher trophic levels shrank and several species disappeared (Guan et al., 2011 and Li et al., 2010). There are indications that in the presence of Microcystis, the zooplankton shifted their diet to the detritus-bacteria pathway rather than grazing on living phytoplankton ( de Kluijver et al., 2012). A macroinvertebrate survey in 2007 by Cai et al. (2012) showed that small individuals (e.g. Tubificidae) appear in large numbers in the algal blooming zone ( Fig. 5, 2007). The appearance of mainly small macroinvertebrate species might be related to the absence of refuges to prevent predation (e.g. macrophytes) ( Cai et al.

Comments are closed.