63 ± 0.64 kg). Although there was no significant difference in general characteristics such as age and obesity related parameters (Table 4), different gut microbiota was observed between groups. The rarefaction curves showed the difference of gut microbiota between the two groups (Fig. 4). The richness of bacterial communities obtained from EWG was relatively higher than that of IWG. Phyla of Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, Tenericutes, and Bacteroidetes were predominant in EWG samples of prior to ginseng intakes, whereas Firmicutes, Actinobacteria, and Proteobacteria were dominant in IWG samples (Table 5, Fig. 5A). Relative abundances of Actinobacteria

and Proteobacteria in EWG were lower than those in IWG, whereas phyla of Tenericutes, Bacteroidetes, and Firmicutes were more abundant in the EWG than IWG. Furthermore the relative abundances of Firmicutes, Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria AZD2281 solubility dmso were significantly different between both groups. These results partly correspond with the earlier one. Samples with fecal activity potently metabolizing ginsenoside

Rb1 to compound K had lower levels of Proteobacteria and higher levels of Tenericutes and Bacteriodetes than in samples with fecal activity non-metabolizing ginsenoside Rb1 to compound K [20]. For detailed microbial composition, we analyzed the composition of genera, it had http://www.selleckchem.com/products/Metformin-hydrochloride(Glucophage).html also noteworthy differences between groups (Table 5, Fig. 5B). The three predominant genera in EWG were Blautia, Anaerostipes, and Oscillibacter, whereas those in IWG were Bifidobacterium, Blautia, and Clostridium_g4. The relative abundances of Anaerostipes and Eubacterium_g5 were increased in EWG, whereas that of Lactobacillus was increased in IWG. Furthermore, selleck chemical the relative abundance of Bifidobacterium, Escherichia, and Clostridium_g23 in EWG were significantly lower than those in IWG. However, the genera that

had significant differences between the groups (Clostridiales_uc_g, Oscillibacter, Ruminococcus, Holdemania, and Sutterella) were not consistent with a previous study [20]. Individual variations of gut microbiota [35] can generate these different results, so it is not easy to compare directly between the two limited sample sized studies. The antiobesity effect of ginseng could work differently depending on gut microbiota composition as explained above. We also wanted to know whether ginseng could make changes of gut microbial composition. Therefore, we investigated changes of microbial composition after ginseng intake. Each group showed changes in microbial composition; the three main dominant genera of EWG were changed to Blautia, Faecalibacterium, and Anaerostipes, and those of IWG were changed to Bifidobacterium, Blautia, and Clostridium at the genus level ( Fig. 5C and D). However, neither group showed statistically significant changes at the phylum or genus level (data not shown).