In both in vitro and in vivo studies, it has been particularly useful because it can be added while qE is already activated to dissipate the \(\Updelta\hboxpH\) (Amarnath et al. 2012; Johnson and Ruban 2010). The addition of selleck inhibitor nigericin separates qE from the other NPQ components. There are other

chemicals that can be used to alter the electrochemical gradient. Gramicidin and carbonylcyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone (CCCP) dissipate both \(\Updelta\hboxpH\) and \(\Updelta \psi\) (Nishio and Whitmarsh 1993). Valinomycin, a potassium transporter, dissipates only the \(\Updelta \psi\) (Wraight and Crofts 1970). These treatments were used to determine that the \(\Updelta\hboxpH,\) not the \(\Updelta\psi,\) is the trigger for qE, as described in the introduction of this Section. N,N′-dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCCD) binds to protonatable carboxylate groups accessible to the lumen in the hydrophobic region of proteins (Ruban et al. 1992). It has been used to

determine whether a protein is pH sensitive and to identify protonatable residues in antenna complexes of PSII (Walters et al. 1996) and the protein PsbS (Dominici et al. 2002; Li et al. 2002b). The enhancement of cyclic electron flow around PSI by chemical electron donors and acceptors such as PMS and DAD led to the discovery of qE, as discussed in the introduction of this section. This approach has been used to provide information about the trigger of qE because it enables researchers to manipulate the pH of the lumen without involving PSII. As an example, DAD has been used to decrease the pH of the lumen below physiological levels to investigate qE in mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana Ro 61-8048 supplier (Johnson and Ruban 2011). More generally, a challenge in using

chemical inhibitors is that they may have multiple interactions in the chloroplast that are not fully known or characterized. As a result, pathways other than the desired one may be affected. qE mutants Plant mutants that display enhanced or inhibited quenching have aided in identifying the components that are necessary to see a full qE response. Many of these mutants were Exoribonuclease created by randomly mutating A. thaliana seeds by fast neutron bombardment, treatment with ethylmethyl sulfinate (EMS), or transfer DNA. Seedlings are selected and characterized by their fluorescence yield, often using a video Cilengitide manufacturer imaging technique developed by Niyogi et al. (1998) that allows for rapid visualization of NPQ on a large number of mutagenized seedlings. Plants with altered NPQ levels compared to wild type can then be further characterized. This method allowed for the identification of many qE mutants. These mutants are listed in Table 2. Table 2 A. thaliana mutants used to study qE Names Mutations Effects npq4 (Li et al. 2000) Lacks PsbS function Decreased amount of qE, slower turn on and off compared to wild type npq1 (Niyogi et al. 1998) No violaxanthin de-epoxidase activity Decreased qE, slower turn on and off compared to wild type npq2 (Niyogi et al.