In our study, we found that the expression of LRIG1 was decreased

In our study, we found that the expression of LRIG1 was decreased, whereas Fludarabine supplier the expression of EGFR was increased

in bladder cancer tumor versus non-neoplastic tissue. This finding suggest that the downregulation of the LRIG1 gene may be involved in the development and progression of the bladder cancer. In order to detect the relationship between LRIG1 and EGFR on bladder cancer cells, we examined the expression level of EGFR on T24 and 5637 cells after transfection of LRIG1 cDNA. We observed that up-regulation of LRIG1 did not have an impact on the endogenous EGFR mRNA level, but it was followed by a substantial decrease in the protein level of EGFR. It was reported that upregulation of LRIG1 transcript and protein upon EGF stimulation, and physical association of the encoded protein with the four EGFR orthologs of mammals [13]. As we known, LIRG1 could enhance the ligand stimulated ubiquitination of ErbB receptors in a c-Cbl dependent manner [14]. Cbl-mediated receptor ubiquitylation marks the onset of attenuation. The previous study indicates that overexpression of Cbl in cells promotes EGF-stimulated receptor ubiquitylation and degradation [29]. In the see more following study, we concluded that upregulation of LRIG1

could induce cell apoptosis and suppress cell growth, and furthermore reverse cell invasion in T24 and 5637 cells. All of this changes of biological behavior suggest IWR-1 solubility dmso that LRIG1 is a tumor suppressor gene on aggressive bladder cancer cells. However, the change of biological behavior

is not exclusively attributed to the restriction of one molecule, as the signal transduction is a complicated matter in cells [21, 30]. In our study, we examined the effect of LRIG1 gene transfection on the expression of several key regulators involved in the EGFR signaling pathway, including MAPK and AKT. We found that p-MAPK and p-AKT in T24 and 5637 cells were significantly reduced following LRIG1 cDNA transfection which also inhibited phosphorylation of EGFR. Because of the above results we can conclude that LRIG1 indeed affects the biology behaviors of baldder cancer cells in vitro by inhibiting phosphorylation of EGFR and the downstream signaling pathway. And we found that EGFR expression is critical for the effect of LRIG1 on bladder cancer cells in vitro. Taken together, these results could offer a novel therapeutic strategy for suppression Etofibrate of bladder cancer by restoration of LRIG1. Grant support This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31072238, 31172441, 31372562, 81170650) and National Major Scientific and Technological Special Project for Significant New Drugs Development (2012ZX09303018). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. References 1. Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Hao Y, Xu J, et al.: Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J Clin 2008, 58:71–96.PubMedCrossRef 2.

Comments are closed.