Intact DNA fragments are critical Tipifarnib datasheet for metagenomic library construction [9–11] and to characterizing intact genetic pathways either by sequence-based or function screening-based approaches [12, 13]. Moreover, excessive degradation of DNA reduces the efficiency of shotgun sequencing [2]. The recovery of total RNA with high integrity is necessary for proper cDNA synthesis

and absolutely essential for describing the gene expression in a community sample [4, 14–16]. In the present study, we compared the effect of different storage conditions of stool samples on microbial community composition, genomic DNA and total RNA integrity. Results and discussion Effect of storage conditions on genomic DNA In order to investigate the effect of storage conditions on the quality of genomic DNA, we chose a subset of stool samples collected by 4 volunteers (#1, #2, #3 and #4) and that had been stored in the following 6 conditions: immediately frozen at −20°C (F); immediately frozen (UF) and then unfrozen during 1 h and 3 h; kept at room temperature (RT) during 3 h, 24 h Fer-1 datasheet and 2 weeks. In this case, all 24 samples were kept at −80°C in the laboratory until genomic DNA was extracted and its integrity analyzed using microcapillary electrophoresis. In all the tested conditions the amount of DNA obtained was in the range of 70–235 μg/250 mg of fecal sample, which is

sufficient for downstream analysis such as metagenomic library construction or shotgun sequencing [2]. As illustrated in figure 1 microcapillary electrophoresis revealed that genomic DNA was mostly preserved as high-molecular

weight fragments when samples were stored immediately after collection at −20°C in a home freezer or left up to 3 h at room temperature. However, DNA became TPCA-1 ic50 fragmented when samples were allowed to unfreeze during 1 h (subjects #2 and #3) Edoxaban or stored at room temperature over 24 h (subjects #1 and #2). DNA degradation further increased and nearly all high-molecular weight fragments disappeared when samples had been kept over 2 weeks at room temperature (#1, #2 and #3). In order to provide a semi-quantitative comparison, we extracted the signal intensity from the gel using the ImageJ software. This signal is converted into a number that is proportional to the DNA quantity. As shown in figure 1, we used the upper size-range (rectangle A) of the frozen sample as a proxy for “no degraded DNA” and the lower size-range (rectangle B) for “degraded DNA” (figure 1). The threshold of 1.5 kb was used to discriminate the 2 size-ranges, since it is recommended for shotgun sequencing in the 454 protocol from Roche Applied Science. Proportion of degraded DNA for each sample was then calculated by the ratio between the lower size-range intensity and the total intensity. Our results, displayed in Table 1, showed a significant degradation (p < 0.