These light-driven oscillations were absent in WT mice (data not shown). By driving MCs at different frequencies (from 25 to 90 Hz), the resulting LFP power exhibited a maximal response at a preferred resonant frequency in the γ range (maximum at ∼66 Hz, Figure 6E), corresponding to the dominant frequency of spontaneous γ oscillations ( Figure 6D). PTX injection (0.5 mM) Depsipeptide price significantly decreased this resonant frequency of oscillations (maximum at ∼50 Hz, Figure 6E). This shift in resonant frequency was also observed after TBOA injection

( Figure S5A). In contrast, an NMDAR antagonist caused a global reduction of light-evoked γ oscillation without changing the resonant frequency ( Figure S5B), consistent with the observed effect on spontaneous γ. Changes in evoked LFP frequency did not result simply from increased

MC firing rate. Indeed, strongly increasing MC firing activity with continuous light stimulation ( Figure 6C) failed to enhance γ power in both baseline and PTX conditions (baseline: +10.6% ± 7.8%, p = 0.455 and PTX: +10.2% ± 6.3%, p = 0.233, with a paired t test; n = 33) and has negligible effects on γ frequency (baseline: +0.77 ± 0.31 Hz and PTX: −0.70 ± 0.26 Hz; n = 33). To investigate the features of dendrodendritic inhibition, we assessed the light-evoked inhibition of MC firing activity triggered by their synchronous activation. A 5 ms light-pulse triggered synchronous spiking followed by a transient inhibition of firing that resumed within ∼10 ms (Figure 6F). This protocol elicited disynaptic inhibition as indicated by the delayed BMN 673 solubility dmso onset of the inhibition (8.8 ± 0.3 ms, n = 13) and confirmed by its partial blockade using MK801 (Figure S5C). Strikingly, reducing inhibitory tone did not modify the amplitude of the light-evoked inhibition (baseline: −60.6% ± 6.5% decrease in the firing rate and PTX: −72.1% ± 4.3%; p = 0.148, with a paired t test,

n = 13) but significantly increased the time to peak (baseline: 2.8 ± 0.4 ms and PTX: 4.0 ± 0.4 ms; p = 0.041) and the decay kinetics of MC firing inhibition (baseline: 6.3 ± 0.6 ms and PTX: 9.1 ± 0.9 ms; Idoxuridine p = 0.023; Figure 6F). Upon PTX application, neither the magnitude of light-evoked firing (baseline: +262.1% ± 24.9% increase in firing and PTX 0.5 mM: +222.6% ± 24.6%, p = 0.222; Figure 6F) nor the mean spontaneous MC firing rate (baseline: 17.4 ± 1.5 Hz and PTX 0.5 mM: 18.5 ± 1.4 Hz; p = 0.33) significantly changed, as already reported in Figure 4C. By recording MCs distant to the stimulation zone, we were also able to record light-evoked lateral inhibition of MC firing (Figure 6G). Here, the lateral inhibition was identified as a light-evoked inhibition of MC firing when light stimuli did not directly increase firing (Figure 6H). In these cells, PTX treatment did not modify the maximum amplitude of light-evoked inhibition (baseline: −69.8% ± 5.8% decrease in firing and PTX: −74.3% ± 6.6%, p = 0.