Thus, it can be argued that compared to the other ecosystems, seagrasses provide advantages in terms of accessibility, safety and productivity. For the whole study only one feature stands out – basket trap fishers fishing in coral habitats during the northeast monsoon (Fig. 3). Significant values were found for both catch biomass and income (Table 4, Supplementary Data; Fig. 3 and Fig. 4). Interview studies have shown that basket trap fishers in Chwaka Bay have a higher income per day compared to others (de la Torre-Castro and Ronnback, 2004) and the present study confirms the previous findings. Nevertheless, basket trap fishers have previously reported a preference for seagrass

habitats; but large catches from coral habitats are possible to obtain since adult abundance is normally higher in coral areas than in seagrasses due to the nursery BLZ945 nmr function of the latter; some fish may also prefer deeper waters found in coral environments (e.g. Cocheret de la Moriniere et al., 2002). In addition, fishers explained that during the northeast monsoon lots of fish move inside the bay for shelter and catches tend to be very good. The relative gains from the coral environment are, however, restricted to only one season and one gear, with the boxplot showing an extremely high data dispersion ( Galunisertib mw Fig.

3 and Fig. 4). Since we do not have time replication it is necessary to replicate this study to confirm this finding. From an economic perspective the income generated by SSF is crucial for the household economy in Chwaka Bay (de la Torre-Castro, 2006). Livelihood diversification analyses in the surrounding villages of the bay show that fishing is still the primary source of income (de la Torre-Castro and Ronnback, 2004; de la Torre-Castro, unpublished data). However, this SSF provided generally low income. Most income values fall

very close to the extreme poverty line. The definition of “extreme poverty” was set as all income below 1 USD day−1 when the data was collected (UNDP poverty line index); nowadays, UNDP has increased the value to 1.25 USD day−1. The income data show that the median income ranged between 0.9 and 5.94 USD fisher−1 day−1. These low values show that irrespective of which habitat is used for fishing the population remains to a large extent in poverty. Rucaparib supplier However, it is important to point out that the economic data in this study refers to gross income only, based on the fish prices at the market auction. The advantages of fishing in seagrass habitats in terms of, for instance, fuel and effort savings were not accounted for and thus total net income per capita was not calculated. Such calculation would most probably increase the relative value of seagrass habitats. The dispersion of the data (Fig. 3 and Fig. 4) provides an indication of catches variability which in turn can be related to a steady flow of income over time.