© 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc Microsurgery,

2011 “
“Ear a

© 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc. Microsurgery,

2011. “
“Ear amputation is a devastating injury characterized by a conspicuous deformity Ibrutinib clinical trial that is not easily concealed and can result in tremendous psychological trauma in addition to the physical insult. While numerous different approaches have been proposed, microvascular replantation is widely considered to deliver the best esthetic outcome. In this article, the authors report a case in which an unconventional perfusion pattern (i.e., arterialization of the venous system) was chosen, as intraoperative anatomic conditions precluded conventional vascular reconstruction. A 25-year-old male patient sustained a human bite resulting in subtotal amputation of his left ear. In the setting of an adequate arterial donor vessel, that is, branch of the posterior auricular artery, and a single suitable recipient vein (0.4 mm), the decision was made to perform an end-to-end arterio-venous anastomosis without the use of vein grafts. Medicinal leeches were applied postoperatively to provide for venous drainage. The ear survived and the patient was discharged after 14 days. To the best of our knowledge, this is first case of a subtotal ear amputation that was successfully

replanted by arterialization of the venous system without the use of vein grafts and with preservation of the superficial temporal vessels. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microsurgery 34:657–661, 2014. “
“Background: The choice of recipient vessels is an important factor selleckchem for successful head and neck reconstruction. Finding good recipient vessels for neck microsurgery can be difficult ifoxetine after patients have undergone radiation therapy, previous neck dissection or developed neck infections due to pharyngocutaneous fistulae.

Thoracoacromial arteries and veins can be good alternatives to common recipient vessels in such patients. We reviewed the complications, advantages and disadvantages associated with using thoracoacromial arteries and veins as recipient vessels. Methods: We reviewed eight patients whose thoracoacromial arteries and veins served as recipient vessels for head and neck reconstruction between 2002 and 2009. Preoperative status, reconstruction method and operative outcomes with complications were evaluated. Results: Postoperative complications related to microsurgical anastomosis developed in two of the eight patients. One arterial and venous thrombosis developed in each patient. We considered that the arterial thrombosis was derived from a technical problem with the operation and the venous thrombosis was derived from postoperative external pressure. Conclusions: Thoracoacromial arteries and veins are good recipient vessels for patients who have undergone ablative or reconstructive surgery, radiation therapy, or have a neck infection due to complications.

Comments are closed.