This section deals specifically with the standards and guidelines applicable to fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis. Genet Med 2011:13(7):667-675.”
“Over one million patients worldwide have end-stage renal disease and require dialysis or kidney transplantation. Despite the availability of these forms of renal replacement therapy

for nearly four decades, mortality and morbidity are high and patients often have a poor quality of life. We have developed a human nephron filter (HNF) utilizing bottom-up nanotechnology that would eventually make feasible a continuously functioning, wearable or implantable artificial kidney. The device consists of two membranes operating in series within one Dinaciclib device cartridge. The first membrane mimics the function of the glomerulus, using www.selleckchem.com/products/mk-4827-niraparib-tosylate.html convective transport to generate a plasma ultra filtrate, which contains all solutes approaching the molecular weight of albumin. The second membrane mimics the function of the renal tubules, selectively reclaiming designated solutes to maintain body homeostasis. No dialysis solution

is used in this device. The HNF has been computer modeled, and operating 12 hour per day, 7 days per week the HNF provides the equivalent of 30 ml/min glomerular filtration rate (compared to half that amount for conventional thrice-weekly hemodialysis). The HNF system, by eliminating dialysate and utilizing a novel membrane system created through applied nanotechnology, represents a breakthrough in renal replacement therapy based on the functioning of native kidneys. The enhanced solute removal and wearable design should substantially improve patient outcomes and quality of life.”
“BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Existing research on hospitalist-primary care provider (P(:I)) communication focuses mainly on adult hospitalist models with little known about the quality Vorinostat inhibitor of current pediatric hospitalist-PCP communication. Our objective was to perform a needs assessment by exploring important issues around communication between pediatric hospitalists

and PCPs.\n\nMETHODS: Six previously identified issues around hospitalist-PCP communication from the adult hospitalist literature were abstracted and incorporated into an open-ended and closed-ended questionnaire. The questionnaire was pretested, revised, and administered by phone to 10 pediatric hospitalists and 12 pediatric PCPs residing in our 5-state catchment area. Interviews were transcribed and openly coded, and themes compared using qualitative methods.\n\nRESULTS: The 6 identified issues were: quality Of Communication, barriers to communication, methods of information sharing, key data element requirements, critical timing, and perceived benefits. Hospitalists and PCPs rated overall quality of communication from “poor” to “very good.