We used the tool to screen three published
studies with sequences deposited in the first 2 months after our GenBank survey took place. Among the 1076 16S sequences published by Fujita et al. (2010), we found 403 (37%) sequences that were reverse complementary (i.e. average HMM detection ratio of 0 : 6), indicating that reverse complementary sequences can be a very significant problem. Screening the very small dataset of Jurado et al. (2010), one among the 39 sequences was reverse complementary (i.e. HMM ratio 0 : 10), indicating that reverse complementary entries can occur even in very small datasets where manual selleck chemical curation should not be an issue. No reverse complementary sequences or any other anomalies were detected among the 11 173 sequences published by Durso et al. (2010), demonstrating that v-revcomp can identify studies of high data integrity with respect to reverse complementary sequences. The fraction of reverse complementary 16S sequences in public data repositories is around 1%, which Z-VAD-FMK research buy must be seen as low, given the error-prone user-controlled submission mechanism and the lack of support for third-party annotation of INSD entries (Pennisi, 2008). Nevertheless, the over 9000 reverse complementary
sequences can have serious implications for downstream analysis if the user is not aware of their status. Furthermore, the number of sequences deposited in these repositories will increase drastically with HTS technologies used in amplicon and metagenome sequencing projects, highlighting the need to detect these events in an automated manner. The clear cases of reverse complementary sequences found in this survey were reported to NCBI for reorientation. NCBI does not need prior agreement with sequence authors in order to correct sequences that were deposited in the incorrect
orientation, and such reorientations are brought about quickly. While the problem of reverse complementary sequences can be avoided with v-revcomp, the number and types of anomalous 16S sequences are of greater concern. It is worrisome that we detected 136 sequences that were taxonomically misclassified at the domain level, and more surprising that 26 cases did Reverse transcriptase not even represent ribosomal genes. Our results stress the importance of critically examining sequences before inclusion in scientific analysis and submission to public databases (Harris, 2003). While v-revcomp is specifically designed to detect reverse complementary sequences, it has certain intrinsic capabilities of detecting some types of sequences anomalies such as reverse complementary chimeras, nontarget genes and erroneous reads. In particular, large-scale metagenome sequencing projects that require automated fragment assembly are prone to errors that could be detected by v-revcomp.