78 7 23 wcaE 946543 predicted glycosyl transferase 1 25 7 26 wcaF

78 7.23 wcaE 946543 Luminespib supplier predicted glycosyl transferase 1.25 7.26 wcaF 946578 predicted acyl transferase 0.97 7.21 gmd 946562 GDP-D-mannose dehydratase, NAD(P)-binding 0.71 6.65 fcl 946563 bifunctional GDP-fucose synthetase:

GDP-4-dehydro-6-deoxy-D-mannose epimerase/GDP-4-dehydro-6-L-deoxygalactose reductase selleck 0.32 6.57 gmm 946559 GDP-mannose mannosyl hydrolase 0.3 6.15 wcaI 946588 predicted glycosyl transferase 0.3 5.92 cpsG 946574 phosphomannomutase 0.09 5.15 cpsB 946580 mannose-1-phosphate guanyltransferase 0.26 5.1 wcaJ 946583 predicted UDP-glucose lipid carrier transferase 0.11 4.82 wzxC 946581 predicted colanic acid exporter 0.1 4.45 wcaK 946569 Colanic acid biosynthesis protein −0.12 4.45 wcaL 946565 predicted glycosyl transferase −0.13 3.63 manA 944840 mannose-6-phosphate isomerase 0.19 1.05 ugd 946571 UDP-glucose 6-dehydrogenase 0.46 4.36 wcaM 946561 colanic acid biosynthesis protein −0.01 2.71 galU 945730 glucose-1-phosphate uridylyltransferase 0.44 1.4 Extracellular polysaccharide distinct from colanic acid yjbE 948534 predicted protein Fosbretabulin nmr 1.55 5.74 yjbF 948533 predicted lipoprotein 1.73 5.67 yjbG 948526 conserved protein 0.67 4.29 yjbH 948527 predicted porin 0.66 5.23 Peptidoglycan

synthesis anmK 946810 anhydro-N-acetylmuramic acid kinase 0.16 1.17 mrcB 944843 fused glycosyl transferase and transpeptidase 0.47 1.01 ycfS 945666 L,D-transpeptidase linking Lpp to murein 0.77 2 Osmotic stress response osmB 945866 lipoprotein 2.41 2.95 osmC 946043 osmotically inducible, stress-inducible membrane protein 0.44 1.15 opgB 948888 phosphoglycerol transferases I and II 0.12 1.27 opgC 946944 membrane protein required for succinylation of osmoregulated periplasmic glucans (OPGs) 0.31 1.85 ivy 946530 inhibitor of vertebrate C-lysozyme 1.55 1.26 mliC 946811 inhibitor of C-lysozyme, membrane-bound; predicted lipoprotein 2.17 3.92 ybdG 946243 predicted mechanosensitive channel 0.69 1.26 dppB 948063 dipeptide/heme transporter −0.29 3.29 dppF 948056 dipeptide transporter −0.1 2.33 dppC 948064 dipeptide/heme transporter −0.09 2.33 dppD Staurosporine in vivo 948065 dipeptide/heme transporter −0.09 2.1 dppA 948062 dipeptide transporter 0.02 1.13 Other stress responses

ydeI 946068 conserved protein 1.99 3.96 treR 948760 DNA-binding transcriptional repressor 0.65 1.88 ibpA 948200 heat shock chaperone −0.01 1.78 ibpB 948192 heat shock chaperone 0.02 2.9 hslJ 946525 heat-inducible lipoprotein involved in novobiocin resistance 2.33 3.32 yhbO 947666 predicted intracellular protease 2.29 2.67 iraM 945729 RpoS stabilizer during Mg starvation, anti-RssB factor 0.33 1.6 creD 948868 inner membrane protein 5.66 4.96 cbrB 948231 inner membrane protein, creBC regulon 5.2 4.29 cbrA 948197 predicted oxidoreductase with FAD/NAD(P)-binding domain 4.3 3.35 cbrC 948230 conserved protein, UPF0167 family 3.77 2.8 spy 946253 envelope stress induced periplasmic protein 1.71 2.99 htpX 946076 predicted endopeptidase 0.27 1.

PubMedCrossRef 20 Tartof SY,

PubMedCrossRef 20. Tartof SY, AZD8186 mw Solberg OD, Manges AR, Riley LW: Analysis of a Wnt inhibitor uropathogenic Escherichia coli clonal group by multilocus sequence typing. J Clin Microbiol 2005,43(12):5860–5864.PubMedCrossRef 21. Trobos M, Christensen H, Sunde M, Nordentoft S, Agerso Y, Simonsen GS, Hammerum AM, Olsen JE: Characterization of sulphonamide-resistant Escherichia coli using comparison of sul2 gene sequences and multilocus sequence typing. Microbiology 2009,155(Pt 3):831–836.PubMedCrossRef 22. Queiroz ML, Antunes P, Mourao J,

Merquior VL, Machado E, Peixe LV: Characterization of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases, antimicrobial resistance genes, and plasmid content in Escherichia coli isolates from different sources in Rio de Janeiro,

Brazil. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2012,74(1):91–94.PubMedCrossRef 23. Campos J, Peixe L, Mourão J, Pires J, Silva A, Costa C, Nunes H, Pestana N, Novais C, Antunes P: Are ready-to-eat salads an important vehicle of pathogenic and commensal bacteria resistant to antibiotics? Clin Microbiol Infect 2011,17(4):S703. 24. Leflon-Guibout V, Blanco J, Amaqdouf K, Mora A, Guize L, Nicolas-Chanoine MH: Absence of CTX-M enzymes but high prevalence of clones, including clone ST131, among fecal Escherichia coli isolates from healthy subjects living in the area of Paris, France. J Clin Microbiol 2008,46(12):3900–3905.PubMedCrossRef 25. Valverde A, Canton R, Garcillan-Barcia MP, Novais A, Bucladesine purchase Galan JC, Alvarado A, de la Cruz F, Baquero F, Coque TM: Spread of bla(CTX-M-14) is driven mainly by IncK plasmids disseminated among Escherichia coli phylogroups A, B1, and D in Spain. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2009,53(12):5204–5212.PubMedCrossRef 26. Novais A, Baquero F,

Machado E, Cantón R, Peixe L, Coque TM: International spread and persistence of TEM-24 is caused by the confluence of highly penetrating enterobacteriaceae clones and an IncA/C2 plasmid containing Tn1696::Tn1 and IS5075-Tn21. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2010,54(2):825–834.PubMedCrossRef 27. Novais Â, Viana D, Baquero F, Martínez-Botas J, Cantón R, Coque TM: Contribution of IncFII and broad-host IncA/C and IncN plasmids to the local expansion and diversification of phylogroup B2 Escherichia coli ST131 clones carrying blaCTX-M-15 and qnrS1 genes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2012,56(5):2763–2766.PubMedCrossRef Casein kinase 1 28. Novais A, Pires J, Ferreira H, Costa L, Montenegro C, Vuotto C, Donelli G, Coque TM, Peixe L: Characterization of globally spread Escherichia coli ST131 isolates (1991 to 2010). Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2012,56(7):3973–3976.PubMedCrossRef 29. Juhas M, van der Meer JR, Gaillard M, Harding RM, Hood DW, Crook DW: Genomic islands: tools of bacterial horizontal gene transfer and evolution. FEMS Microbiol Rev 2009,33(2):376–393.PubMedCrossRef 30. Mao BH, Chang YF, Scaria J, Chang CC, Chou LW, Tien N, Wu JJ, Tseng CC, Wang MC, Hsu YM, et al.: Identification of Escherichia coli genes associated with urinary tract infections.

GAG is commonly found in natural non-K12 E coli isolates [19, 20

GAG is commonly found in natural non-K12 E. coli isolates [19, 20]. Mutations

in rpoS have also been identified in Shiga-like toxin-producing E. coli strains [21]. Polymorphism of rpoS appears to be paradoxical to the central role that RpoS plays in survival. Mutants of rpoS can be selected under LGX818 mw nutrient limitation and exhibit enhanced metabolic potential [22], suggesting a regulatory trade-off for fitness between stress resistance and nutrient scavenging [22]. Growth on weak acids, including succinate [23] and acetate [24], strongly selects for mutations in rpoS in laboratory E. coli strains [23]. Considering that the weak acid (e.g., acetate) concentration is relatively high in human colon (80 mM) where E. coli colonize [25, 26], E. coli may face a similar selective pressure within the host environment. Selection for loss and gain of RpoS function may be an important adaptive mechanism, like phase variation, to ensure that E. coli can survive in CCI-779 complex natural environments. However, whether this selection is responsible for the observed rpoS polymorphism in natural E. coli isolates remains unclear, primarily because most studies have been

done with laboratory E. coli K12 strains. The genomes of E. coli isolates differ substantially and constitute a pangenome consisting of 13,000 genes, of which 2,200 genes are Tariquidar mw conserved among all isolates [27]. Since RpoS mostly controls expression of genes encoding non-essential functions [8, 9, 12, 13], RpoS likely plays a considerable role in the expression of non-conserved genes in the pangenome. Given that E. coli K12 strains only possess about 1/3 of all genes found in the pangenome of E. coli [27], it is possible that rpoS selection is limited to laboratory strains. Interestingly, selection for rpoS could

not be observed in a natural E. coli isolate ECOR10 under nutrient limitation (see Fig 5 in [22]). In this study, we wished to address three outstanding questions. First, can rpoS mutants be selected in clinical strains isolated from natural environments? Of particular interest is whether this selection occurs in pathogenic strains, which may have important medical relevance because of the potential role of RpoS in bacterial pathogenesis. Second, are there other Idelalisib clinical trial factors involved in the selection for enhanced metabolic abilities in natural strains? Finally, is there any evidence that this selection occurs in natural environments? To address these questions, we employed a succinate selection strategy as a tool [23] and examined the selection using a group of ten representative verocytotoxin-producing E. coli (VTEC) strains from all five identified seropathotypes as our model strains. VTEC strains, including the O157:H7 serotype, are responsible for most E. coli foodborne outbreaks and can cause severe diseases, including diarrhea, hemorrhagic colitis and the hemolytic uremic syndrome [28].